I had this recommended to me by someone on one of the
previous 31 Days threads. I have a movie also called Frightmare that my brother Scott gave to me as a gag gift. It looks
terrible and I've never even opened the shrink-wrap on it. (It's also known as Paranoid.) There's yet another film
called Frightmare from 1983 (aka Horror Star) that also looks to be
pretty terrible. I haven't seen it, though I remember thinking the poster
looked like that of a kickass heavy metal band (it has everything you want -
skulls, snakes, knives and zombies).
Luckily, I also have a copy of the ORIGINAL Frightmare from
1974. This one is written and directed by Peter Walker, who also did House of Whipcord and House of the Long Shadows. I'm happy to
report that this is a significantly better film than either of subsequent
versions appear to be. (Though, to be fair, I'm only going on reviews and
trailers for those films.)
The Medium
I recently found a copy of the 2000 Euroshock Collection DVD for $2.97 at Bull Moose. It's a bare-bones affair with nothing on the disk but the film itself. The picture quality is so-so, with many scenes appearing either washed out or too dark to make out details. Kino Lorber released a Blu-ray version in March of this year and it looks significantly better (at least from the stills) and also includes a commentary track, featurette and interview. If you can find the Blu-ray, that looks like the way to go.
I recently found a copy of the 2000 Euroshock Collection DVD for $2.97 at Bull Moose. It's a bare-bones affair with nothing on the disk but the film itself. The picture quality is so-so, with many scenes appearing either washed out or too dark to make out details. Kino Lorber released a Blu-ray version in March of this year and it looks significantly better (at least from the stills) and also includes a commentary track, featurette and interview. If you can find the Blu-ray, that looks like the way to go.
This also looks to be available via streaming on Amazon (free with Prime).
The Movie
In 1957 a court commits Edmund and Dorothy Yates to a mental hospital for a series of horrific crimes. Eighteen years later they're released, and Edmund's daughter from a previous marriage - Jackie - checks in on them from time to time. Unfortunately, she begins to suspect that her mom may be having a relapse...
In 1957 a court commits Edmund and Dorothy Yates to a mental hospital for a series of horrific crimes. Eighteen years later they're released, and Edmund's daughter from a previous marriage - Jackie - checks in on them from time to time. Unfortunately, she begins to suspect that her mom may be having a relapse...
FYI - she's having a relapse. |
Meanwhile, Jackie's half-sister Debbie is behaving badly.
She's out at all hours of the night, egging her boyfriend into fights over imagined
or invented slights and screaming epithets at her sister. Though Jackie's new
boyfriend, Graham, tries to intervene and help Debbie deal with her abandonment
and parental issues - but Debbie knows a lot more than she lets on, and she may
be very much her mother's girl.
One of the few moments she's not yelling at someone. |
Wow. So, low budget to the extreme. Very 1970's. Pacing is a
bit weird and plot twists are telegraphed a mile away. And yet... there's a lot
more depth than I expected here. There's commentary on family dynamics,
particularly in blended families, and poor Jackie finds out just what it's like
to be the stepdaughter sometimes. There's an indictment of modern psychiatry
and the very idea that anyone with a mental illness can be 'cured.' It's a crap
stance, but an interesting one to explore in a horror context. There's the idea
that love can be an enabling force, a weakness that allows evil to grow.
And then there's Dorothy. Sheila Keith is just amazing as
the mother with an 'appetite' issue. She's at turns violent, kind, wheedling,
sneaky, open, fearful, manipulative and maternal. Sometimes all of these in one
scene. She brings a depth and gravitas to the role without making Dorothy the
least bit sympathetic. In one particular scene she uses a feigned weakness to
turn Jackie's father against her, and the look of sly, cunning glee on her face
is genuinely disturbing.
This sequence is also pretty disturbing. |
Because Dorothy has indeed relapsed. And as she's a psychotic
cannibal, that's very problematic. She's placing ads in newspapers advertising
tarot readings for the lonely and depressed. She's got tarot cards, a unique
ability to read the very lonely, and a power drill. And she's going to use them
all (plus a red hot fireplace poker).
Debbie, meanwhile, has started to show signs of the very
same tendency. Soon the police are involved and Jackie and Graham race to try
and help her. Unfortunately for them, Debbie already HAS help.
"Guess who mom likes better!" |
Cinematography is hard to judge, given the quality of the
DVD, but it seems some thought has been given to lighting, anyway. Jackie's
apartment (and that of her friends) is bright, white and clear. Dorothy and
Edmund's farmhouse is dark and lit with firelight most of the time, and it
seems to get darker as the film progresses. Acting is above average - with
Sheila Keith being a standout, of course, and Rupert Davies bringing his traditional
low-key gravitas. Deborah Fairfax and Kim Butcher, as Jackie and Debbie
respectively, are not quite at their level - and Butcher in particular has a
tendency to yell instead of emote, but they're both charismatic and attractive.
Paul Greenwood as Graham is a little too understated, but works well enough as
the 'good guy.'
"That's when I knew I was not favorite." |
The general presentation is that of an early 70's
exploitation film, but the skill of the filmmakers and the performances elevate
things slightly.
The Bottom Line
I genuinely enjoyed this film. It's a bit threadbare in spots, but the performances - particularly of Sheila Keith, who I just cannot praise enough - are quite good, the writing is above average for a horror film, and the ratio of plot/action/gore is good enough to keep things moving at a decent clip. It's not quite a masterpiece, but it's a surprisingly good exploitation film.
I genuinely enjoyed this film. It's a bit threadbare in spots, but the performances - particularly of Sheila Keith, who I just cannot praise enough - are quite good, the writing is above average for a horror film, and the ratio of plot/action/gore is good enough to keep things moving at a decent clip. It's not quite a masterpiece, but it's a surprisingly good exploitation film.
No comments:
Post a Comment